Trust science but don’t idolize it, says Vatican astronomer

Those who are stubbornly skeptical of science and those who eagerly embrace science as infallible both have a dangerous misunderstanding of the nature of science, an American Jesuit astronomer has said.

These two tendencies reflect “the temptation to make science or faith a fortress against our fundamental and human fear of uncertainty,” writes Jesuit brother Guy Consolmagno.

“We trust the (COVID-19) vaccine not because it is perfect, but because it dramatically increases the likelihood of not getting sick. The real and obvious problem is that most of we cannot understand how probability works: that is why casinos and lotteries are so successful,” he wrote in an article published in the Jesuit journal La Civilta Cattolica.

The article, which appeared in Italian in the January 15 edition of the journal, was titled “COVID, Faith and the Fallibility of Science.” A copy was distributed to reporters on January 13.

Anti-vax supporters and conspiracy theorists have the wrong idea of ​​what science is and what it can promise, according to the summary of the newspaper article. On the other hand, those who mistakenly consider science to be infallible unfortunately end up fueling scientific skepticism.

Brother Consolmagno, planetary astronomer and director of the Vatican Observatory, wrote that it is important for people to understand the true purpose of science and how important and necessary doubt is in order to progress and gain better understanding.

Faith in science versus faith in religion has implications beyond distrust of vaccines

A popular slogan right now in the fight against the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic is “Trust science,” he wrote.

The slogan should be understood as saying that science is a reliable and trustworthy path to truth; however, to some it seems to suggest that science is “the only” trustworthy guide, he said.

This false either-or dichotomy fuels the fallacy that faith and science are at odds, he said. It could also partly explain why a September 2021 Pew study found white American evangelicals to be the least likely religious group to get vaccinated.

“It’s as if to say that the distrust of science present in this community, which translates into skepticism about vaccines, follows a perceived need to choose between science and faith. “, he wrote.

Thank you. You are now subscribed to the daily newsletter

“The opposition between faith in science and faith in religion has implications beyond distrust of vaccines. It is evidence of a fallacious view of what science is and of what she can promise,” Brother Consolmagno said.

“This misunderstanding is prevalent not only among those who are skeptical of science, but also, and perhaps even more dangerously, among those who embrace (science) too hastily” because when science does not show itself not live up to any kind of “exaggerated reliability, that failure only fuels skepticism” about science in general, he said.

People may not want to admit it, but “there is some truth in this fear of placing unquestioning trust in science,” he said. “Science sometimes makes mistakes.”

COVID-19 vaccines “prevent disease in the overwhelming majority of those vaccinated and reduce disease severity,” he said. “But vaccines aren’t perfect,” and people can still get sick, albeit rarely seriously.

Science is based on doubt and error, said the Jesuit, a graduate of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. “Failure is not an option, it is a requirement” and knowing that one “knows nothing” is what pushes to deepen the study and to progress.

Accepting this uncertainty, however, requires you to also accept the risks of attempting something uncertain.

Science is always incomplete by its very nature, always growing and evolving as new knowledge and experience accumulates, he said. It’s perfectly fine to read an old philosophy or theology book, “but you’ll never study your grandfather’s biology textbook,” he said.

“You only become a scientist when you’re able to look at something that you thought you understood and you end up saying, ‘That’s not true!

“Accepting this uncertainty, however, forces you to also accept the risks of attempting something uncertain. You cannot win a regatta without risking tipping over,” the Jesuit said, recalling that the boat he cruised in college never rocked. and he never won a race.

“Certainty is not a religion, but fanaticism; it’s not science, it’s scientism,” that is, blind faith in science, he says.

The thirst for certainty and distrust or rejection of authority are strange companions since one wants “a perfect truth and, at the same time, one rejects anyone who claims to be able to guide us towards this truth”, a- he said.

What ends up happening, he said, is that people start looking for their own answers, do their own research online, and “favour secret sources of knowledge only accessible to a few people in the know.”

What is particularly dangerous, he said, is when clinging to these personal beliefs comes at a cost, such as losing one’s job, and it is felt to be an act of persecution. A purely erroneous belief can then become so ingrained that it can never be accepted as false since it has become a fundamental part of one’s being and identity.

“Science doesn’t give the perfect truth,” but experiments and theories can be constantly refined, giving people increasingly accurate descriptions of nature, he said.

“Doing science depends on loving even the boring parts of meticulous study, on believing even when confidence in our scientific progress wavers, on being ready to forgive and learn from those who have made mistakes in the past. Loving means living in uncertainty, learning to trust,” he said.

Living with the uncertainty of illness, the fallibility of science and the fear of losing personal autonomy requires trusting the work of others, which – like love – must be done “with caution and boldness”, said he declared.

Be reasonably careful, don’t jump blindly, but also believe in knowledge, which is beautiful and fallible, he said. Despite the imperfection of science, it still leads to an increased likelihood of living a healthy life.

“We are happy that God has given us the ability to understand and appreciate his creation through our science,” he said.

Support UCA News…

….As we enter the early months of 2022, we ask readers like you to help us keep UCA News free.

For 40 years, UCA News has remained Asia’s most trusted and independent Catholic news and information service. Every week we publish nearly 100 news items exclusive, in-depth reports, reports, commentary, podcasts and video shows, and developed from a view of the world and the Church through discerning Catholic eyes.

Our journalistic standards are as high as those of the quality press; we are particularly focused on a rapidly growing part of the world – Asia – where in some countries the Church is growing faster than pastoral resources can meet – South Korea, Vietnam and India for n to name just three.

And UCA News has the advantage of having in its ranks local reporters covering 23 countries in South, Southeast and East Asia. We report the stories of local people and their experiences in ways that Western media simply don’t have the resources to reach. And we report on the budding life of new Churches in ancient lands where being Catholic can sometimes be very dangerous.

With diminishing support from funding partners in Europe and the United States, we need to enlist the support of those who benefit from our work.

Click here to find out how you can support UCA News. You can make a difference for as little as US$5…